Nothing (i)_____ scientists more than seeing a longstanding problem in their field solved by an outsider. If you question this (ii)_____, consider the (iii)_____ reaction of paleontologists to the hypothesis by Luis Alvarez — a physicist — and Walter Alvarez — a geologist — that dinosaurs were wiped out by a large meteor impact.
| Blank (i) | Blank (ii) | Blank (iii) |
|---|---|---|
| A. amazes | D. exposition | G. contemptuous |
| B. pleases | E. objurgation | H. indifferent |
| C. nettles | F. observation | I. insincere |
This three-blank question requires understanding the tone and logic of the passage.
Blank (i): The example shows paleontologists reacted badly to outsiders solving their problem. Scientists are irritated or annoyed by this — not amazed or pleased. Nettles means to irritate or annoy, which fits perfectly.
Blank (ii): The word introduces the supporting example: “if you doubt this _____”. “Exposition” means an explanation or presentation; “objurgation” means harsh scolding (too strong a word); observation means a stated claim or remark — the most neutral and fitting choice here.
Blank (iii): Since paleontologists were annoyed that outsiders solved their problem, their reaction to the Alvarez hypothesis would be contemptuous (scornful, dismissive). “Indifferent” means uncaring (doesn’t convey negativity), and “insincere” means dishonest (unrelated).
Correct Answers: Blank (i) = C (nettles), Blank (ii) = F (observation), Blank (iii) = G (contemptuous).
Sign in to join the conversation and share your thoughts.
Log In to Comment